Articles

BBC Dymond & Trump Author Schwarz

…. Dumb Talks To Even Dumber

This interview staggered me. The BBC astound me on a daily basis. They are awfully competent as confusing, obfuscation, misdirection, propaganda promotion and downright lying. They are ironic entertainment, for me at least. This BBC R4 PM so called flagship news programme was up there with the high standard of dumb. I met, albeit briefly, Jonny Dymond at my art exhibition at the British Consulate in 2005.

It was interesting to observe ex-pats fawn over this BBC celebrity. Today he sits in on BBC R4 PM as well as being the new BBC Royal Correspondent. He is like the Matt Handycock of politics; an empty vessel climbing his greasy pole; at least as a member of the layman listening public, this is my perception.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/correspondents/jonnydymond

His guest on this occasion was Tony Schwarz, author of Donald Trump: The Art Of The Deal.

Keep in mind that Schwarz dislikes Trump so much that he joined the media circuit to campaign for Hillary Clinton against the dreaded Trump. Even if you do not like Trump, anyone with a bit of initiative to research the background of the Clinton’s must at least suspect their ill-gotten credentials for any post within government. Just the Clinton Foundation and abuse accusations against Bill are enough to start with.

Home

I felt impelled to transcribe this interview for the record. It was tedious having to go back over this tripe, but it does illustrate the low standard of information dissemination served up by our UK £3.74 billion funded national news service.

BBC R4 PM news programme
BBC host Tony Schwarz moaning about President Trump for near on 15 mins of an hour show.
I guess you cannot access this unless you are a BBC license payer…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0000qm5
37 mins in….
‘2 years ago in the weeks leading up to the presidential election, Tony Schwarz spoke to PM. Author of Art Of The Deal.
Schwarz wrote the book with little help from Trump, but had hours of intimate contact.
In 2016 he regretted having written the book. He campaigned for Hillary Clinton.
He described Trump as a child, thin skinned, desperate need to show his toughness, immensely dangerous were he to be in charge of the nuclear button.
2 years ago with Eddie NightMair…’

“Yes, he could win and if he does, I’m getting out of Dodge… I’ve already made the plans to move to €urope. Partly because I don’t want to live in a country where he’s President, partly because I expect him to go after his enemies with a literal vengeance…”
“He’ll come after you?”
“Oh, without question in my mind… Richard Nixon was pretty good at it and was nowhere near as crazy as Donald Trump.”

‘Now, 2 years on with Jonny Dymond’

TS: “I was at Hillary Clinton’s victory party till 7.30pm. It was before any evidence that Trump was going to win, but I felt uneasy. I said to my daughter, we gotta get out of here. At home my wife was watching the returns. It was may be a state Trump was expected to win. I got even a worse feeling. I went into another room and went to sleep. Next morning I went down, stepped into the room and my wife burst into tears. I felt a deep sense of shock and despair.”

JD: “You have described him as a grifter, charlatan, huckster, he has attention deficit disorder, behavioural issues, a sociopath. He won against the assessment of many experts. Does part of you respect him for the win, doff your hat to him?”

TS: “Not in the slightest. He’s a man deeply unfit to be president. He won, I strongly suspect with the help of the Russians. He lost the popular vote. He only won an electoral victory by 70,000 votes. He ran against a candidate that was very damaged. He ran in the midst of fear which he spent many months stoking and I respect him no more than I would respect any criminal or authoritarian who was, quote ‘victorious’, but at such a severe cost and by using strategies that were so illegal, or even if not illegal, unethical and questionable, that admiration is the farthest thing from my mind.”

JD: “You’ve said of him, there is no inner life; nothing is going on inside. Do you think that any depth has been added in any way by his presidency?”

TS: “I’d like to think that I’m a person who is capable of seeing the full range of a human being and I really do believe that the work I do is very focused on this. His development got arrested at a very early age, almost surely in reaction to what we might call traumatic circumstances even though he grew up in great economic privilege, he grew up with a very brutal father, a brother who responded to his father’s brutality by becoming an alcoholic and dying at the age of 41; a grandfather who was much of a grifter as Trump himself became; and a mother who was incredibly neglectful; not only couldn’t protect the young Trump from his father, but barely spent any time with him and that’s a formula for absence of both maternal care, but even parental care; that’s formula for really bad stuff to happen, because you become desperate to find somewhere the affirmation, the love, the care that you didn’t get as a child and in Trump’s case, in order to defend himself, in order to make himself feel safe, he cut himself off from the kinds of things we associate with a healthy or relatively mature adult, empathy, subtlety, rationality and above all, conscious, an ability to distinguish and to care about to difference between right and wrong. You know the sociopath is a person who cannot feel a sense of shame or whose shame is so over whelming Jonny, that they have to push it away because the feeling is just too intolerable; to feel that shame is to feel obliterated and that I believe is at the heart of Trump’s, both his character or lack of character and his behaviour.

JD: “You warned about him having access to the nuclear codes, his ability to order a nuclear launch unconstrained by other arms of the US government. Does that still concern you?”

TS: “Deeply. Why wouldn’t it? This is a man who is not in control of his emotions. Whose erratic nature the world has seen over and over again.”

JD: “You don’t think he has grown in office?”

TS: “Again, given the nature of his pathology, given the nature of his early deprivation, given the time I’ve spent talking to psychiatrists and people in the field of mental health, it’s simply not what happens to a sociopath; to what might be called a malignant narcissist. It really doesn’t matter by the way whether you diagnose him; a psychiatrist is, according to the cannons of the profession, not supposed diagnose him. I’m not a psychiatrist, so you could say I shouldn’t be diagnosing him because I don’t have those credentials, but the actual diagnosis isn’t important; you know who Trump is by watching him, and if you spend even a few hours with him, it is incredibly clear, that this is not a man you want with his hand anywhere near a nuclear button.”

JD: “Do you think the Presidency satisfies what you’ve previously identified as his need,
his desire, for an audience. Is this the ultimate stage for him?”

TS: “Well, that’s what’s scary, is that by virtually any standard you could imagine, if what you wanted in life was power and attention and respect, or at least the appearance of respect, how could you get more than by being President of the United States? And all you have to do is look at his comments to know it is not working for him; that he feels aggrieved in every moment and that he feels a kind of paranoid sense that the world is out to get him, that he’s being treated unfairly, that he’s not getting what he deserves, and this is his life time sentence; he never will feel like he gets what he needs. He is as I’ve said before, a black hole and this I’ve observed up very close countless times, that no matter how much you put into this man, no matter how much adulation, money, power, it seems to drain out of him as fast as it comes into him and he ends up feeling empty, needy and he’s in a kind of classic addictive mode which is that you give the heroin addict an infinite amount of heroin and all it does is prompt them to keep upping the ante because the initial high you get from the drug begins to wane and in order to get that same high you keep upping the dose. Well, Trumps way of upping the dose was to run for President and win, but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t need to keep upping the dose. There is no external set of things that could happen for Trump that would make him feel OK. It’s broken inside. It’s not how much he gets or doesn’t get from outside.”

JD: “You have always been clear about your hostility to his politics, all aspects of his politics, whether his sexual politics or his traditional left right politics or how he talks about immigrants. There are those of course who think that certainly aspects, in fact perhaps great swathes of his Presidency have been a success and you look at the economy where wages are rising, unemployment is very low, the boom times are effectively in America. There are people who say America has much more swagger on the world stage than it did under Barak Obama. Has he done anything right in this Presidency? Some of this must be down to him.

TS: “Listen. I suspect of course there must be something that he’s done that have had some, that I would perceive as having some value. I honestly can’t think of them off hand. For example, the state of economy is a fierce mortgage against the future because our debt, the idea that we oughtn’t live in debt, that is a core conservative principle, and what they’ve done with this tax reduction for the very very wealthy, is they have vastly expanded the debt which will come home to roost for certain. It’s not clear at what moment, but they themselves, meaning conservative thinkers, because Trump is not a thinker, have railed against the idea of putting ourselves in debt of mortgaging our future and now Trump is doing it, they’re accepting it. So, I don’t think that simply because you flood wealthy people with more money and corporations in particular with more money by virtue of tax cuts and the economy gets temporarily expanded and the unemployment rate therefore goes down, is any evidence that that’s serving our future well. Let me give you an even better example: I just came from the US where as you know we’ve been experiencing the next in line of this extraordinary weather in the form of category 4 hurricane which hit the South East part of Florida, the South West part of Florida, both, and it’s clearly a function of what’s happening with global warming and we have this week seen 40 eminent scientists say that the future of the planet is so threatened that we’re going to see catastrophic consequences within the next 20 years unless and probably, I shouldn’t say probably, but may be even we totally focus on it as something we need to address, the likelihood is we’re going to see huge consequences. Well, Trump along with the people who support him, refuse to even acknowledge that global warming is occurring. It’s a kind of suicide mission. So, if you’re expanding the economy by pouring toxins into the environment, which is one thing which continues to happen, that’s hardly evidence of a successful move that you’ve made.

JD: “What about you? You said that if he won, you’d get out of Dodge. That you would get out of the country and also you said that you were concerned about your own well-being… you haven’t left the country. Why not?”

TS: “Well, there’s two issues there. One is, where, from a selfish perspective do I want to live and I’m an American, I’ve lived my whole life there, my roots, my family live there. My business is there. I’m comfortable in many ways there. So, all things being equal, I would rather stay in the US. Then there is the personal safety issue which I was very concerned…. that I would be at risk. I’m quite sure that I’m on Trump’s enemies list. I don’t know what number I am, but I’m plenty visible in the media, speaking in ways that are may be more triggering to him than others because he knows I know. So, I’m not stupid and realise there is a risk in doing this. There is an argument for my living somewhere else in order to be safer.

JD: “You genuinely believe your well-being, your safety is at risk?”

TS: “I don’t actually feel at risk. I don’t feel the sense of fear in my body. So, that’s the most significant answer I can give you. Rationally I would say I am somewhat at risk. May be I can be once incredibly explicit about this. The moment that Trump feels that he can get away with anything, anything, that serves his power and his cause, he will do it. That’s the only thing that stands in the way. Do I believe that trump would imprison or murder countless people he perceives as enemies, if he thought he could get away with it, do I think he identifies with and even admires people like Kim Jung Yun and Vladimir Putin? Yes I do! So if it were to come to the point where Trump for whatever reason felt free to act on those impulses, I would assume that I and many other people who had spoken out against him, would be at risk of death. For sure.

JD: “There is a horrible, horrible for you, irony here, isn’t there? He has through his victory, his breath taking Presidency, made you immortal to some degree; you will be known as the man who enabled him, in part, to become President through authoring The Art Of The Deal.”

TS: “As you started to say that I felt emotion well up in me. I do feel that for two years now, I have been doing everything I can to atone for that choice I made. But, you are right. In the end I cant. There is no atoning. The decision was made. I’m not so grandiose as to believe that I was responsible for Donald trump’s becoming President. I was not. There had to be a confluence of many many factors and no one will ever know how much of a role The Art Of The Deal played in all of that, but it did play some role and any role was a bigger role than I should have played, than I wished I’d played, than I anticipated would be true when I was 33 years old and he was a middle level real estate developer and I decided to do that book. But, here’s what I did know. I knew that he was bad man. I knew it when I started writing the book. I learned it having a previous journalistic experience with him and there’s no question that the better choice, the more ethical choice would have been not to have write that book.”

JD: “You sold out.”

TS: “I sold out. You know, I’ve said this before. The term was invented to define what I did. There’s just no question.”

This is just part of the never ending BBC onslaught aimed at Trump as it is Brexit and Corbyn. The BBC is little more than a tabloid red top and perhaps not as good. To sit through this self-pitying codswallop was a chore, but when I heard it aired live, I wanted it chronicled as an example of how low our national broadcaster has gone. If nothing else, are the BBC and Tony Schwarz seriously telling me the Clinton’s would have been better? I have not yet come across a single case of Trump raping anyone. The Clinton’s have a long list to be investigated at least.

Trump? Zionist? Corbyn? Socialist? Brexit? UK-€U military unification…. None of them are cut and dry issues, but the BBC present such a bias opinion when a decent and proper national broadcaster could offer so much more from history to health to science to…. the best interests of the nation.

 

 

Congratulations Chuka-Upah Oomoonooo

… on your new job with the Progressive Policy think tank.

About

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/10/chuka-umunnas-451-an-hour-new-job-will-help-his-opponents-no-end/

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexwickham/chuka-umunna-centrist-think-tank-65000

Indeed, Chuka-Upah joins an organisation which includes Danny Kruger among its speakers at the:

CPP Inclusive Growth Conference

… lovely, cuddly Danny of Boles & Kruger, the Department of Chaos & Creative Destruction:

Tory MP calls for local government planning to be replaced by ‘chaos’
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/dec/18/coalition-local-planning-boles-chaos

A key member of David Cameron’s inner circle was at the centre of controversy tonight after he was filmed stating that the prime minister and his deputy, Nick Clegg, want their “people power” revolution to unleash “chaotic” effects across local communities. The comments, by Nicholas Boles, Tory MP for Grantham and Stamford, were made 10 days ago during a debate in Westminster hosted by the polling organisation Ipsos MORI. During a question-and-answer session on the “big society”, Boles – viewed by Cameron’s circle as an “outrider” for imaginative thinking on policy – was asked why he seemed to prefer “chaos” to central planning of services.

Boles’ statements have echoes of comments made in 2005 by another key Cameron ally and one-time adviser Danny Kruger. He was forced to resign as a Tory candidate for Sedgfield after he was quoted as saying that the Conservatives “plan to introduce a period of creative destruction in the public services”.

Chuka-Upah’s The Progressive Policy think tank £65K salary will be guaranteed…

About

The Centre for Progressive Policy is independent and impartial. We are not aligned with any political party and are a not-for profit organisation. We are fully funded by Lord David Sainsbury, as part of his work on public policy. Lord Sainsbury also acts as chair to the Centre’s advisory policy council.

So, congratulations to Chuka-Upah. I wonder if they’ll invite President Trump to speak at one of their all inclusive events?

 

 

Turkey. Saudi. Israel. 28 Redacted 9/11 Pages.

The Turkish Saudi Khashoggi scandal. Trump redacted 28 pages of the 9/11 report. It seems if Saudi go down, they can take Israel with them. How will Trump manage the situation?


Jamal Khashoggi disappearance: US asks Turkey for recording evidence
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45897153

Saudi suspect in Khashoggi case ‘dies in car accident’: Report:
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/saudi-suspect-in-khashoggi-case-dies-in-car-accident-report-138007

Saudi and Israeli seem to be connected with regard with all sorts, not least Syria….

An Example Of 9/11 Inside Job 3 hour 28 mins 40 secs into Ryan Dawson video below….

Trump redacted 28 pages of 9/11 report which showed Al-Quaeda sponsorship by Saudi royal family.
The news didn’t report it…. because…
FBI full field reports from West coast implicate Saudi, but they have kept quiet since…
FBI full field reports on West coast implicate Israel
If the Saudis are brought down, ‘you’re (Israel) coming with us….’ hence the Zionist media have played down the Saudi involvement.
Prince Bandar and Prince Turki al-Faisal had provided money to the two hijackers of Flight 77 living in California, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, via the wives of Osama Basnan and Omar al-Bayoumi.
https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/saudi-arabia-faces-the-missing-28-pages
… Saudi complicity and the CIA knew, but failed to inform the FBI until the August before 9/11.
CIA financed, gave logistical support and protection from federal law agents.
That alone, makes 9/11 an inside job.
Add the even more damning stuff on Israel (Empire Unmasked 6 hour film by Ryan Dawson)
Iran-Contra was started by Israel sending contraband to Iran…. ending up murdering over 30,000 Nicaraguans

Weebos in Japan, MMA, USA,

 

Labour Based Currency

 

 

Thank God The Climate Changes

Yes, the climate changes, always has and hopefully will continue to do so. But, it is not anthropological nor is carbon dioxide a threat. Quite the contrary, Co2 is a gas essential to the perpetuation of life on earth. I don’t know why Sir David Rottenborough continues to push the carbon cult and the desire for world population reduction, but it’s not a scientific fact; it is a political ideal.

Certainly, a little homework will produce endless documentation about who and why the anthropological climate change myth has been perpetrated. Humans are deemed a disease upon the earth and provide an excuse for control them to save the planet! Of course, climate deniers are on a par with holocaust deniers…. oh deary me.

I do not quite understand Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn perpetually banging on about climate change when his brother Piers was at the alternative climate change Paris conference.

Published on 9 Oct 2018
According to a new report from UN’s IPCC we only have 12 years to halt catastrophic global warming. Mainstream media warned of “climate hell” if we do not make “unprecedented changes” to stop global temperatures rising by 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Henrik looks closer at the global temperature data set (HadCRUT4) that was used to produce the conclusions in this UN report. The only independent audit of HadCRUT4 has been made by PhD. John McLean and it shows incredible sloppiness and embarrassing amateurish methods that have been used to produce the data, making it extremely unreliable.

New IPCC Report: Catastrophic Global Warming, We Only Have 12 Years (Again!)

UPDATE – BOMBSHELL: audit of global warming data finds it riddled with errors

UPDATE – BOMBSHELL: audit of global warming data finds it riddled with errors

Main points:

The Hadley data is one of the most cited, most important databases for climate modeling, and thus for policies involving billions of dollars.

McLean found freakishly improbable data, and systematic adjustment errors , large gaps where there is no data, location errors, Fahrenheit temperatures reported as Celsius, and spelling errors.

Almost no quality control checks have been done: outliers that are obvious mistakes have not been corrected – one town in Columbia spent three months in 1978 at an average daily temperature of over 80 degrees C.  One town in Romania stepped out from summer in 1953 straight into a month of Spring at minus 46°C. These are supposedly “average” temperatures for a full month at a time. St Kitts, a Caribbean island, was recorded at 0°C for a whole month, and twice!

Temperatures for the entire Southern Hemisphere in 1850 and for the next three years are calculated from just one site in Indonesia and some random ships.
Sea surface temperatures represent 70% of the Earth’s surface, but some measurements come from ships which are logged at locations 100km inland. Others are in harbors which are hardly representative of the open ocean.

When a thermometer is relocated to a new site, the adjustment assumes that the old site was always built up and “heated” by concrete and buildings. In reality, the artificial warming probably crept in slowly. By correcting for buildings that likely didn’t exist in 1880, old records are artificially cooled. Adjustments for a few site changes can create a whole century of artificial warming trends.

IPCC achieves net zero credibility
The IPCC well knows that halving CO2 emissions in 12 years is politically impossible, economically unaffordable and climatically unnecessary….

IPCC achieves net zero credibility

 

 

Labour Based Currency

Sitting here doing arty stuff… with Ryan Dawson talking to his buddy. Firstly, apart from artists doing art stuff, who has 4 hours, 39 minutes and 9 seconds to watch and listen to videos?! It’s interesting stuff, but I’m familiar with Ryan and most of the references…

Some one asks 3 questions for $5 including books to read on economics.
He answers anything by Ron Paul, and…

Basic Economics: A Common Sense Guide to the Economy
by Thomas Sowell
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Basic-Economics-Common-Sense-Economy/dp/0465002609
… and tells of
“The Money Myth Exploded” was one of the first articles of Louis Even, and remains one of the most popular to explain how money is created as a debt by private banks. It is available in the form of an 8-page leaflet (tabloid format) that you can order from the “Michael” office, in several
languages: English, French, Spanish, Italian, German, Polish, Portuguese.
https://archive.org/stream/MoneyMythExploded/MoneyMythExploded_djvu.txt

Isn’t the internet fabulous! Here it is,well, sort of:

The Money Myth Exploded c.1930’s 17mins17secs

The following story was written in the 1930s in New Zealand – about social credit. It was adapted to the present – about mutual credit – and rewritten as a comedy skit by Murray Rogers. The characters’ names represent different admin accounts in H.A.N.D.S. (How About Non Dollar System), Golden Bay’s Local Employment and Trading System….

He also says Money Masters by Bill Still is good, but long.
William T. Still – The Money Masters

Ryan says, “You should base your currency on labour, not on gold nor silver and certainly not on debt….”

Weebos in Japan, MMA, USA,

Ryan says though Ted Kazinsky went awol, his chapter Oversocialization from Unabomber nails it:
https://genius.com/Unabomber-oversocialization-annotated

Further edit on Ryan’s YouTube video….
An Example Of 9/11 Inside Job

3 hour 28 mins 40 secs….
Trump redacted 28 pages of 9/11 report which showed Al-Quaeda sponsorship by Saudi royal family.
The news didn’t report it…. because…
FBI full field reports from West coast implicate Saudi, but they have kept quiet since…
FBI full field reports on West coast implicate Israel
If the Saudis are brought down, ‘you’re (Israel) coming with us….’ hence the Zionist media have played down the Saudi involvement.

Prince Bandar and Prince Turki al-Faisal had provided money to the two hijackers of Flight 77 living in California, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, via the wives of Osama Basnan and Omar al-Bayoumi.
https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/saudi-arabia-faces-the-missing-28-pages
… Saudi complicity and the CIA knew, but failed to inform the FBI until the August before 9/11.
CIA financed, gave logistical support and protection from federal law agents.
That alone, makes 9/11 an inside job.
Add the even more damning stuff on Israel (Empire Unmasked 6 hour film by Ryan Dawson)
Iran-Contra was started by Israel sending contraband to Iran…. ending up murdering over 30,000 Nicaraguans

 

 

12 Years To Save The World!?

More BBC Climate Comedy

I turned this off about 10 mins in because I’ve heard it all before from the cultural Marxist BBC and here they are, at it yet again…

Just as Ryan Dawson of http://www.ancreport.com/ likes to say ‘John McCain is dead’, this is another excuse for me to type Monbiottom.

Man Made climate change is a UN scam to promote the idea of the human being as a disease upon the earth to be controlled. It’s bollocks. Fracking, 5G and the cutting down of trees are concerns to be addressed. Donald Trump may be surrounded by blasted neo-con Zionists, and we must challenge them, but he was absolutely correct to withdraw from the evil IPCC climate change crap accord. If Corbyn loving ‘lefties’ question my hard line, ask Jeremy Corbyn’s brother Piers:
http://www.weatheraction.com/

On BBC R4 AQ George Monbiottom once called Piers a ‘bad weather forecaster’. Do Piers’ clients pay him for his bad forecasts then George?

This is the ridiculous BBC programme of propaganda…

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0000nhn

Twelve years to save the world. While we’re squabbling about Brexit, climate scientists are reminding us that the existential threat of our day is global warming. This week’s report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issues the most extensive warning yet on the risks of rising temperatures. According to its authors, keeping to the preferred target of 1.5C above pre-industrial levels will mean cutting carbon emissions by 45% by the year 2030. That will involve, they say, “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society”. Decades of increasing prosperity, freedom and choice in the West have come at a cost. The rest of the world wants rapid growth too, but should they be allowed to have it? In a society that badly needs to learn the meaning of ‘delayed gratification’, how should we, as individuals, change our behaviour? When the priority is putting food on the table, many choose economic expedience over sustainability – it can be expensive to go green. Would it be right for the government to make us all greener by taxing or even banning log-burning stoves, gas-guzzling cars and cheap air travel? Many make the moral case for saving the planet on behalf of our grandchildren. But what of our moral obligation to those who don’t yet even exist? Is it morally dubious to put the theoretical interests of posterity before the real and immediate needs of poor people today? If climate change is the organising call of our age, how should we respond?

Combative, provocative and engaging debate chaired by Michael Buerk.
With Shiv Malik, Anne McElvoy, Tim Stanley and Giles Fraser.
Witnesses: Leo Barasi, Author of “The Climate Majority: Apathy and Action in an Age of Nationalism”; Ross Clark, Journalist, author and political commentator; Charlotte Du Cann, Core member of the Dark Mountain project; and George Monbiot, Journalist, columnist and campaigner.

 

 

NotForYouTube

Censorship. Isn’t it endlessly fascinating? I’m so grateful 3rd parties have my best interests at heart to save me from the unpalatable ideas of others. Mary Whitehouse lives on. Dennis Wise, ex Wimbledon footballer name sake and now apparently a history documentary film maker has produced this little naughty 4 hour ditty. This is banned on regular platforms such as NotForYouTube e.g.

… but, can be found on Mike Adams’ Real Video platform.

I took a still from the footage and would like to categorically confirm that neither NED nor Riot is anything whatsoever to do with Mrs. Slocombe’s pussy or Ned. I doubt this Dennis Wise production will be aired on the BBC anytime soon.

New World Order: Communism by Backdoor:
https://www.real.video/5826452099001

 

 

JK Rowling Joins Anti-Corbyn Band Wagon

I bought, read and enjoyed JK Rowling’s 5 Harry Potter books. It was 10 years or more ago now, so without checking I think it is 5. The TV has apparently broadcast a documentary about the sweat and toil of Rowling’s early early years and today she is heralded as a successful heroine. Are we still allowed to use the term heroine or is that too gender binary in JK’s increasingly politically correct world? Mind you, with the swish of a wand JK could have a penis or not, couldn’t she? It’s bloody ridiculous. If you follow such news programmes as the http://www.nedpamphilon.uk/uk-column-news/ you will be aware agendas are much darker and sinister than the mere level of ridiculous. JK has sponsored and promoted children such as Bana as part of the appalling propaganda against Assad and the Syrian people. Now she has joined the anti-Semite band wagon. For an apparently clever and successful author and business woman she seems clueless of the ins an outs of Syria, Israel and the geo-political world. But, then so is the BBC.

In J.K. Rowling’s new novel, a villain is an Israel-hating anti-Semite

For months author J.K. Rowling has been warning about the dangers of anti-Semitism in England, sparring on Twitter with critics who either downplay the phenomenon or say its proponents are confusing criticism of Israel with Jew hatred.

Now, in her newest book, she includes a character whose obsessive anti-Zionism morphs into anti-Semitism.

“Lethal White,” the fourth novel in Rowling’s Cormoran Strike mystery series, written under the pen name Robert Galbraith, features a pair of hard-left political activists who believe “Zionists” are evil and have a stranglehold on Western governments.

Extortionist Jimmy Knight’s extreme hatred of Israel has led him to hate Jews.

“I wouldn’t trust him if it was anything to do with Jews,” Knight’s ex-wife tells a detective. “He doesn’t like them. Israel’s the root of all evil, according to Jimmy. Zionism: I got sick of the bloody sound of the word. You’d think they’d suffered enough,” she says of Jews.

Rowling’s depiction of a far-left anti-Semite comes at a time of record high anti-Semitism in Britain, where she lives. Britain’s Labour Party and its leader Jeremy Corbyn have been accused of insensitivity to Jews and condoning anti-Jewish sentiments within the party’s ranks. Corbyn previously defended a grotesquely anti-Semitic London mural depicting Jewish bankers, and referred to his “friends” in terror groups Hamas and Hezbollah, though he’s said he now regrets these positions.

A September 2018 poll found that nearly 40 percent of British Jews would seriously consider emigrating if Corbyn became prime minister — as polls show he might.

The latest novel isn’t the first time the author of the Harry Potter series has commented on the dangers of anti-Semitism.

“Most UK Jews in my timeline are currently having to field this kind of crap, so perhaps some of us non-Jews should start shouldering the burden,” she wrote in April, in response to a critic who said Judaism is a religion, not a race. “Antisemites thinks this is a clever argument, so tell us, do: were atheist Jews exempted from wearing the yellow star?”

Rowling, who is not Jewish, also shared with her 14.4 million Twitter followers examples of posts she’d received that denied anti-Semitism was a problem.

To a commenter who posted that Arabs cannot possibly be anti-Semitic because Arabs are Semites too, Rowling tweeted a photo of a dictionary definition of anti-Semitism: “hostility to or prejudice against Jews.” She also included a spirited defense of Jews: “Split hairs. Debate etymology. Gloss over the abuse of your fellow citizens by attacking the actions of another country’s government. Would your response to any other form of racism or bigotry be to squirm, deflect or justify?”

When a Jewish mother tweeted Rowling to say her son had faced anti-Semitic bullies in school, Rowling tweeted back “so sorry” and wrote “Know that you aren’t alone and that a lot of us stand with you xx.”

A few months later, on Aug. 26, after a fellow mystery writer, Simon Maginn, tweeted that British Jews’ outrage over Corbyn’s views were “synthetic,” Rowling defended the Jews. “What other minority would you speak to this way?” she posted, before quoting from Jean-Paul Sartre’s essay “Anti-Semite and Jew.”

In 2015, Rowling declined to endorse open letters calling for a cultural and academic boycott of Israel and signed by over 1,000 British authors and opinion leaders. Instead, she joined 150 other writers and artists in penning an alternative letter opposing singling out Israel for opprobrium.

“Israelis will be right to ask why cultural boycotts are not also being proposed against…North Korea,” her Oct. 23, 2015 letter declared. Instead of boycotts, the letter said, “Cultural engagement builds bridges, nurtures freedom and positive movement for change.”

Rowling has been critical of the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu but is adamant that Israel, its people and its supporters should not be subjected to a double standard by their opponents.

Article end.

I am thoroughly enjoying President Trump; particularly the way snowflakes, the ‘left’, never Trumpers, the BBC, indeed the establishment persistently get their knickers in a twist about him. Obama was a war monger while thus far Trump has not initiated war. I am an enthusiast of Trump. But, Trump’s major donors are Sheldon Adelson, Paul Singer and Bernard Marcus. A cynic might even suggest such characters influence US foreign policy:
Follow the Money: Three Billionaires Paved Way for Trump’s Iran Deal Withdrawal:

Follow the Money: Three Billionaires Paved Way for Trump’s Iran Deal Withdrawal

 

Hey JK, how easy is it to buy a ticket and go visit Palestine as a tourist? I don’t know, I’ve never tried, but I do wonder.

 

 

 

God Has To Meet My Standards!

Dr. E. Michael Jones talks directly and clearly to Jan Irvin with humour on subjects including Darwin, Hawking, Dawkins and Judaism. I guess he broaches several taboos all in one session, which of course appeals to me; discussing controversial ideas I do not necessarily agree nor disagree with, but the BBC would deem politically incorrect and probably not engage.

I was tempted to title this Turtles All The Way Down… go to 21.30 mins for this reference to the the symbol of cosmology in India….

UnSpun 110 – Dr. E. Michael Jones: “LOGOS”

15 mins
The universe brought itself into existence…
18.50 mins
The eye can’t come from a blind ameba… that which is cannot come from that which is not”
20.10 mins
Stephen Hawking, he just died a week ago or so. What was before time? Anti-time….why didn’t the whole world burst out laughing when the guy said something this stupid…?
Before time, there was no time, that’s why it’s time!
Darwinists all make the same stupid mistake.
21.30 mins
Symbol of cosmology in India….
turtles all the way down…
Before matter there was anti-matter and before anti-matter there was matter-matter?
Metaphysics 101 and every Darwinist flunks it.
Darwinism wrecks reason.
The Michelson–Morley experiments showed there was no earth motion what so ever… (wow!)

Scientific Proof THE EARTH DOES NOT MOVE : Michelson–Morley Experiment

The stars move while the earth is stationary…
Note:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment

Although the estimated difference between these two times is exceedingly small, Michelson and Morley performed an experiment involving interference in which this difference should have been clearly detectable. But the experiment gave a negative result — a fact very perplexing to physicists. Lorentz and FitzGerald rescued the theory from this difficulty by assuming that the motion of the body relative to the æther produces a contraction of the body in the direction of motion, the amount of contraction being just sufficient to compensate for the difference in time mentioned above. Comparison with the discussion in Section 11 shows that also from the standpoint of the theory of relativity this solution of the difficulty was the right one. But on the basis of the theory of relativity the method of interpretation is incomparably more satisfactory. According to this theory there is no such thing as a “specially favoured” (unique) co-ordinate system to occasion the introduction of the æther-idea, and hence there can be no æther-drift, nor any experiment with which to demonstrate it. Here the contraction of moving bodies follows from the two fundamental principles of the theory, without the introduction of particular hypotheses; and as the prime factor involved in this contraction we find, not the motion in itself, to which we cannot attach any meaning, but the motion with respect to the body of reference chosen in the particular case in point. Thus for a co-ordinate system moving with the earth the mirror system of Michelson and Morley is not shortened, but it is shortened for a co-ordinate system which is at rest relatively to the sun.
— Albert Einstein, 1916

Does The Earth Move For You?

24.45 mins
Einstein’s theory of relativity saved the phenomena, that’s why he’s important.
Richard Dawkins insists everything is an infinite progression of small steps.
Where’s the talking animal?
The human being is the only animal that has logos.

Newtonian physics is weaponised science

38.00 mins
It was Adan and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
We have to talk about this stuff because the the oligarchs have forced it upon us.
The oligarchs believe truth is the opinion of the powerful
Denigrate morality and you denigrate truth. Oligarch’s have money and power. The only tool against money and power is moral law; truth.
Eliminate moral law and you eliminate the concept of being; of meaning to life; procreation!
Sodomy is meaning, pointless recreation, so you don’t ask for a raise.
Michel Foucault: pact with the devil….
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Foucault
The new left: you give me unlimited sex and I won’t criticise your economic system.
The arts: even if you’re not a homosexual, you should act like a homosexual.
The Jews rejected baby Jesus because he wasn’t a big strong warrior leader David.
The Magi were humble enough to accept something that did not conform to their plan.

Jones was denounced by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an anti-Semite because he the temerity to write a book on the Jews.
https://www.splcenter.org/
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Jewish-Revolutionary-Spirit-Impact-History/dp/0929891074
49.00 mins
Polite people don’t talk about ‘Jews’
Wilhelm Marr created anti-Semitism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Marr
…. a Jew is a theological construct

50.00 mins
Jesus is logos incarnate…..
The Jew is a theological concept; nothing to do with race; the Ashkenazi are not Semites.
Some of the Jews accept Jesus; the children of Moses or the Catholic Church…. the Jews have been revolutionaries since that time.
The Talmud is a long winded rejection of logos
You can begin with Simon bar Kokhba
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_bar_Kokhba
…. and take it all the way up to Amy Dean bragging how Jews gave us gay marriage…
How Jews Brought America to the Tipping Point on Marriage Equality: Lessons for the Next Social Justice Issues:
https://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/how-jews-brought-america-to-the-tipping-point-on-marriage-equality-lessons-for-the-next-social-justice-issues
They could not accept Jesus; they knew who his parents were i.e. God has to meet my standards!
It wasn’t the Messiah they wanted, so they killed him.

Jordan Peterson being asked about Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s book 200 Years Together:


Jordan Peterson Is Asked About ‘The JQ’ At His NY Talk

Jews score so well at SAT’s because they cheat.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT

We’re not going to tolerate this ridiculous double standard anymore. You’re just like everybody else, you should be held accountable; you don’t get a free pass because you are a Jew.
I love the Jews because they are my enemy.

– o0o –

End of video interview. I assume there is plenty of material above to invite accusation of anti-Semite, homophobia, misogyny, xenophobia and other ists and isms I’ve neglected to mention.

P.S. By contrast, Thomas Sheridan feels he can better manage Judaism to it’s hanger-on religions Christianity and Islam. Plus, he says, of course there was a holocaust.
Being Spirituality Authentic:

 

 

Agenda 21’s SWT Dog Ambassadors

Suffolk Wildlife Trust are cutting down trees. Knettishall Heath on the Suffolk-Norfolk border is a prime example. The Woodland Trust is cutting down trees. There is a policy to cut down trees nationwide directed by un-elected foreign parties such as CBD; the Convention on Bio-Diversity. Knettishall has inspired a website:
http://www.wood-wide-web.net/
Platforms are writing about the issue:
https://www.phacemag.com/brian-phook—wood-wide-web—save-the-knettishall-trees.html

The environmental scam Agenda 21 is manifesting in local ways and recruiting unwitting local people.

Apparently,
Suffolk nature reserve no longer dogged by disturbance:
http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/suffolk-nature-reserve-no-longer-dogged-by-disturbance-1-5404964

The project apparently involves society members volunteering as “dog ambassadors”.

Now general public, breathe in, breathe out. Good people; note my gender diverse noun.

Next, walking. One foot in front of the other, then bring the other foot in from of that…. very good. That’s called walking!

Now, pick up your dog’s faeces in your plastic bag and deposit in an appropriate bin whereby lots of little packets of of faeces in their individual plastic bags can slowly degrade all together within a larger plastic bag. But, ssshhhh, don’t tell SWT Ambassador Sir David Rottenborough that you are touching plastic; he might seek a few more £million to make another BBC taxpayer funded extravaganza about the disease that roams upon planet earth called the human being.

“,… Waveney District Council had enacted a Public Space Protection Order that related to dogs on the site, adding an extra layer of provision, but the ambassadors’ “dialogue” with the dog-owning community since they began patrols in 2015 had proved “pivotal” in promoting responsible and sensitive dog behaviour on the reserve.”

Oh jolly good; cultural Marxism thrives within the countryside.

“Happy Paws Dog Training Society chairman Mark Willeard said: “We have about 12 ambassadors, the majority are from Happy Paws, and it has been a very positive experience all-round for us. We’ve been able to educate people as to why responsible dog behaviour is so important and how it can help the wildlife on the reserve and we will be continuing our involvement here. We’ve made lots of new members as a result of this project and we can teach them the skills they need to bring their dogs to the reserve and we can help them in general.

Really, how we survived in the countryside before the Suffolk Wildlife Trust, goodness knows.

“The ambassador scheme would continue to help the reserve in the future – and would stand it in good stead for its hoped-for extension which was the aim of the trust’s £1million Broads appeal, which currently stands at about £850,000.”

Ah yes, money. Lots of of it. Keep paying up general public, keep paying up! The ‘Al Gore-Obama-Rottenborough-the science is a done deal-carbon cult’ is not ‘science’ or a real deal. It is a political ideology, a scam to put it bluntly. But hey, if you believe in it, what can I do?

 

 

The Carbon Cult Rocks On

‘Elon Musk smokes marijuana’ was the BBC headline. 8 million views and counting.

Joe Rogan says bitch, mutha f–ker and casually swears. He jokingly invites Musk to swear, but Musk declines. At one point Musk profoundly reminded us that love is the answer. It must irritate those managing the struggle well below the billionaire level to hear these grand masters of business and celebrity remind us that love is the answer. Oi Elon, I’ll trade you some love if you pay my bills this month!

I listened to this 2 hour plus chat and am tempted to conclude garbage. Elon Musk is a billionaire, so he must be intelligent to some extent, mustn’t he? Joe Rogan is perceived by many as the cool internet sensation who has interviewed all sorts including, and interesting for me, Graham Hancock and John Antony West; I’m interested in Göbeklitepe.

Musk is a carbon cultist. He promotes science, yet holds a belief system with apparent religious fervour. OK, Dr. Rupert Sheldrake is a scientist and a Christian and been criticised for it, so….. Musk promotes Newton, the earth as a lump of molten lava surrounded by a thin crust and appears to hold to the big bang theory of linear time. May be he’s right on some accounts, but I’m not convinced and anyone insisting upon anthropological climate change can go take a flying jump; it is a Maurice Strong UN political ideal, not done deal science, no matter how many times Nobel Peace Prize bomber Obama insists it is.

Joe Rogan Experience #1169 – Elon Musk

Shortly after I saw the Musk interview, came Paul McFarty on BBC R4 Today promoting his latest album and equating climate change deniers with holocaust deniers. McFarty insists footage of the WWII work camp Belsen is irrefutable proof of holocaust. I knew a 5 time survivor of WWII camps and he survived because he volunteered for the typhus block, but just suggesting such things now risks incarceration for thought crime in Germany. Try Ernst Zündel Paul! What if some one does question WWII history? Should their thoughts result in imprisonment? McFarty referenced Al Gore’s film as climatic proof. Oh Jesus H. Christ, the man can write a good tune, but don’t let this disciple of the carbon cult into politics or governance of the people.

Ernst Zündel interviews David Cole-part 1:

Paul McCartney on handling crowds, and why he calls Donald Trump “the mad captain”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-45482360

Onto a UK parliamentary fracking debate.

Permitted Development and Fracking – 30min Parliamentary Debate

Minister of State, Claire Perry MP, refers to opponents of fracking as, “… a traveling circus of protesters.”
She mentions ‘the realities of climate change’ and offers figures which are correct unlike the figures of the opposition argument which of course are incorrect. She is yet another example of the appalling governance of my country; as far as I can observe, the carbon cult rocks on.

I welcomed President’s Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Change. Apart from Trump’s disappointing Zionist inclinations, I observe an intelligent and astute man contrary to the views frequently expressed on the BBC accusing him of being unintelligent, irresponsible and chaotic. I even suspect Trump follows an intuition even he sometimes does not fully understand; intellect thinks while intuition just knows.

Climate change? Ask Jeremy Corbyn’s brother Piers…
http://www.weatheraction.com/

Environmental policy
WeatherAction supports True-Green-Policies to defend biodiversity and wild-life and reduce chemical and particulate pollution and points out that CO2 is not a pollutant but the Gas-Of-Life (plant food).
Evidence based science
WeatherAction defends evidence-based science and policy making as the ONLY science. WeatherAction completely supports campaigns for GeoEthical accountability and CLEXIT – Exit from UN Climate Change Deals and against data fraud and political manipulation of data and so-called scientific claims now dominating climate and environmental sciences. Evidence shows that man-made climate change does not exist and the arguments for it are not based on science but on data fraud and a conspiracy theory of nature. (see “Why the CO2 ‘theory’ fails “, below)….

…. and so he continues on his website. I heard George Monbiottom of The Guardian on BBC R4 refer to Piers Corbyn as a ‘bad weatherman’, but then George does have an arse in his name.

Listen out how many times a media talking head spouts the words ‘climate change’ as if they hold the moral high ground while you should take note and heed their climatic warning. It’s called cultural Marxism in my book or Collectivism. It is not science, but political ideology. Beware, because there could be a point whereby climate denial could be made into an arrestable offense just as historical revision is today in countries such as Germany and Austria. Avoid the fear mongers and think for yourself. You never know, you might be right and they just could be wrong.

 

 

BBC Good. RT Bad. Call In Ofcom.

In recent years I have enjoyed more content on RT, formerly known as Russia Today, than I have the BBC. For me the BBC are a joke; a laugh; ironic entertainment; even in denial?

The other night, the BBC R4 news gave up a classic example of how out of touch they and our Westminster MP’s are.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0bgw30s

It’s always Russia! At least it seems that way recently….
Illustration: Bollox Johnson, Gavin Defense Prefect Williamson and Gav’s pet tarantula…

 

I do not buy the UK government narrative on the Salisbury Novichuckle story. Of course I sympathise with the death of a British citizen, but will not play the game of kowtowing to the nonsensical story the government and the BBC are pushing. Where are the Skripals? What is the connection between Skripal, Steele and Pablo Miller? Has a D-Notice been issued on what the UK media can and cannot publish and broadcast? No, of course I do not know what happened, but the like of Bob Seely MP must be held to account for the allegations and assumptions he makes on our taxpayer funded national broadcasting platform. What is he after? WWIII?
https://www.bobseely.org.uk/

A few words from Bob Seely MP talking about the RT interview by RT Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan:
“…. pathetic. Laughable. RT equally pathetic in the way she handled the interview.
… expose methodically what the Kremlin are doing… we need to do this on a systematic basis…
… change the visa regime…
…. giving Ofcom greater powers… negative content of Russian broadcasters in this this country…. absurd and pitiful propaganda…”

So, Lyse Lies Dullcet Doucet is an example of high standard journalism is she Bob? My morning BBC R4 Today crew of John Bumhumphrys, Dick Dobbyson, Dustbin Plebb, Usher Meinsane and Harfa Gurney serve up so much tosh and nonsense each day it is more Monty Python than credible news dissemination.

What concerns me is the mention of OFCOM.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/home

We are experiencing increasing censorship. Good job Hitler lost, eh Bob! After all, we wouldn’t want a Big Brother 1984 Ministry of Truth scenario, would we Bob?

Let information be. The truth will out if allowed to. Perhaps the truth scares you Bob?

Even if RT is a Russian state ‘weapon’, what is the BBC Bob? Objective journalism? My arse!

 

 

Dear BBC Feedback Roger Bolton….

This was a note made some months ago…. contemplating writing to Roger Bolton at BBC Feedback.

Dear Roger,
I heard you talk about Steve Hewlett’s fight with cancer as chronicled with Eddie NightMair on BBC PM since September….
All your feedback callers are humbled and emotionally moved by the saga:
Feedback:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08cvmh0
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/statements/steve-hewlett-tributes
The BBC are credited as presenting an, “Amazing piece of journalism…”
The Eddie NightMair Interview:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03m4q5s

Steve Hewlett: Radio 4 presenter dies at the age of 58:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-39027583

I tweeted Steve Hewlett and the BBC to try Clive de Carle… though I may as well have Tweeted pigs are flying in the sky…
While your Feedback listeners congratulate you, I’ve been shouting at the radio…
“For goodness sake, try some other options!”

I might recommend Ty Bollinger:
https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/
I might recommend G. Edward Griffin:

I might recommend an entire movement exploring health issues….
David Noakes: Big Pharma & the Cancer Scam
http://alternativeview.co.uk/index.php?route=information/information&information_id=39

I continue to be mind boggled that there is a law against unauthorised cures for cancer:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/2-3/13/section/4
Doesn’t this tell you something everybody?!

Current online fave Jonathon Pie, regularly featured on DavidIcke.com, suggests the only way to fix the NHS is to vote out the Tories. What, so Labour can fix it Jonathan?
https://www.davidicke.com/article/402790/pie-hunt

No Jonathan, you may be a current in-thing, but left-right makes no frigging difference. Health, cancer, Alzheimer’s, ADHD… is a multi £million business and until we address clean food, clean water, the effects of pharmaceutical product and perhaps, dare I suggest the power of thought, you are not going to solve the problem with a plaster over a gaping gash. But of course, I will be accused of insensitivity and lack of empathy with victims of cancer etc.

Mean while the BBC R4 chronicled Steve Hewlett’s battle with cancer, to the end. Oh Jesus, why didn’t he try the options available? I am not suggesting there are absolute solutions, but Steve Hewlett could have widened the possibilities for himself and the listening public.
Because… ah, what’s the point?! Writing to Roger Bolton would be a complete waste of time as would have been suggesting to BBC R4 Steve could explore the options.

They even had Steve’s children on to discuss the matter post death.

As a final thought: BBC Panorama celebrated Steve Hewlett’s debunking of Dr. Andrew Wakefield. Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear, what a mess. What goes around comes around?

Why Are Cures Against the Law? Clive de Carle Live at Truthjuice 2016:

HUMANITY vs INSANITY – #37 : The Cancer Agenda:

HUMANITY vs INSANITY #108 – MHRA : UK STATE EXECUTIONER:

 

 

The Lady Doth Protest Too Much, Methinks.

Margaret Openheimen Hedgehog called Corbyn that ‘effing racist and anti-Semite’ within the parliamentary chamber. Is this not hate crime according to their own rules? U2 singer Nobo raised his arm and mocked Swedish Social Democratic leader Jimmie Åkesson in Sieg Heil fashion, inferring what? That Akesson does not like others because of their creed or colour?

“… the Swedish, tall, blonde, blue eyed, boring…”
“… my favourite… little Le Penn has changed the name of her party so people don’t know they don’t like Jews or blacks…”

Is this not defamation of character? Is this not hateful speech? Why is it OK for some to slur others, yet others grab their entitlement to feel offended by the most innocuous of MP’s in Westminster, namely Jeremy Corbyn. It is relentless. Yesterday in Manchester a ‘huge’ rally of hundreds against anti-Semitism gathered in Manchester and again Maggie Hedgehog had her cause covered on the BBC news. It comes as the number of anti-Semitic incidents in the UK is at its highest since records began in the 1980s. Really? According to whose survey? The ADL or some such organ?

I made a note having heard a BBC R4 programme whereby Polly Toynbee stated she wants to turn The Daily Mail into The Guardian and the audience applauded. The inference again is Polly has the moral high ground. Is that the same Guardian that openly supports the White Helmet extremists in Syria; the same Guardian that advocates ‘regime change’ in foreign nation states it deems unacceptable?

My imagination conjured up the notion of Nobo the leprechaun and Maggie the hedgehog coming together to pronounce the formation of a new Semolina Party…. how does an MP get to call Jeremy Corbyn ‘that ‘effing racist and anti-Semite’ in parliament and get away with it? Quite easily apparently.

 

Here the ‘awful extremist right-wing’ Breitbart reports upon Nobo’s Paris gig. No, I am not a Breitbart regular; the article came to my attention as many others do from a variety of platforms. I recommend you watch the Paris gig clip. I don’t care what Nobo says, but he and his like will care and lobby against others for any remark or gesture deemed unpalatable…
https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/09/11/bono-nazi-salute-mocking-swedish-populists-paris-show/

Brexit. Trump. Corbyn. Democracy’s great when ‘they’ secure the result they want, isn’t it Nick Clugg, London Mayor Sordik Khant, Lord Andrew Hardly An Adonis?

The dilemma becomes more complicated. There are voices who do raise the issues of immigration and globalism in a sensible and serious manner without reducing it to racism. I like Roseanne and Diamond & Silk, but they do pile on devotion to Israel which appears to be a state based upon racial divide. What is it with this Israel business?

Diamond and Silk “Chit Chat Live” | Guest, Roseanne Barr

Imagine Gilad Atzmon talking with these ladies on the Israel business. Perhaps even more interesting might be Alison Wier.

Who promised Palestine to Netanyahu’s secular Jews? Spot the contradiction with Gilad Atzmon

Alison Weir talks abut Palestine

 

 

 

Gadhafi Bodyguard Talks To Ryan Dawson

Gadaffi bodyguard talks to ANC

 

 

Gadhafi? Gadaffi? Gaddafi? I’ve always written it Gadhafi. The painting is from 2002; commissioned to commemorate a 30 years working relationship between Libya and a Turkish construction company building infrastructure such as aqueducts etc. Note the word construction, as opposed to the destruction ‘we’ along with Obama, Clinton, Sarkozy, NATO et al inflicted upon Libya. What an absolute shame.

Ryan Dawson’s website is http://www.ancreport.com/; Anti-Neo-Con Report. He offers interesting geo-political analysis and a sense of humour. He supports the Palestinians and is frequently censored by the social media platform giants e.g. he is frequently in BookFace jail and has had years of YouTube content removed.

Gadhafi 28/29 brought in by CIA, not Russian Socialist 1969
Libyan patriot
Huge water reserves beneath Libya
Red Cross had jihadists inside their vans
NATO bombed Libya 24/7…. Al Qaeda’s air force.
Unthinkable violent rape by jihadists upon Libyan women…. these atrocities reflect the Bolshevik violence of ‘white Russians’.
Libya is not an İslamic state, it is a Wahhabi shit hole.
Erdoğan is trying to create an Islamic state.
“I don’t wear a head scarf and smoke just to piss them off…. I always carry a gun and a knife…”
Clinton Obama Sarkozy the Qatari fat prince & Saudi brought the wrath to Libya
She knew Ambassador Stephens personally
Gadhafi may be dead, but the man they killed was not Gadhafi

…. Ryan interviews and listens. I listened, found it interesting and perhaps you might too.

 

Colonel Gadhafi
95cm x 140cm
istanbul 2002
NPP: 08068-16112002
Status: Private Collector

 

 

Poor Nazanin. Melanie Who?

While the BBC legacy media and government talking heads bemoan the incarceration of…
Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe has returned to Iran prison:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-45315979
… Melanie Shaw has been in mostly solitary confinement in Gulag UK…

01205-02092018 : Poor Nazanin. Melanie Who?

UK Column Shop: Melanie Shaw Postcards:

https://www.ukcolumn.org/community/shop/postcards/melanie-shaw-postcard/

Any UK citizen is our concern and their release from foreign incarceration must be investigated. But, who has Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe worked for? Reuters? The BBC? Why is it her husband is persistently on the BBC? Perhaps she is, he is, authentic and representing a genuinely sad situation, but why is Melanie Shaw in a UK jail? Where is her public spokes person? Where is Melanie’s Wikipedia entry?

From ‘good old reliable’ Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazanin_Zaghari-Ratcliffe
‘Zaghari-Ratcliffe used to work for the international charity the BBC World Service Trust (now called BBC Media Action)…’

Let’s look at BBC Media Action:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediaaction/about
Transforming lives through media?

https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/bbc-media-action-subversion-broadcasting-house-kazakhstan
BBC Media Action is so arrogant and sure of itself that they even tell us what they are doing. Juliette Harkin, former BBC Media Action Project Manager and an expert on Syria states… “we [BBC Media Action] worked in 2004 with individuals within the [Syrian] ministry who wanted change and tried to get them to be the drivers of that. All media development work that has been done within Syria has, in my opinion, been predicated upon this idea that there can be change from within – you have an authoritarian regime and you find who the reformers are within that [regime] and work with them…”

Imagine, if we had an Iranian or Russian or Syrian or foreign national acting with this agenda within the UK. Would our government welcome and embrace them? Unlikely.

When will the BBC highlight Melanie Shaw’s case? I suspect no time soon.

Poor Nazanin. Melanie Who?

 

 

A Mother Son Conversation

Son: What do you think about Jeremy Corbyn’s anti-Semitic problem?
Mother: I don’t think Jeremy Corbyn is anti-Semitic.
Son: Would you vote for him?
Mother: Yes.
Son: When I see family members, young people, constantly with a mobile phone at hand, I am aware of possible microwave damage. Do you have a comment?
Mother: I tend to think they have their mobile phones too readily at hand. They are fine in their place, but probably grossly over used.
Son: Are you aware of the fertility dangers?
Mother: I have heard about it, but it hasn’t penetrated my brain to much of a degree because it doesn’t affect me I suppose.
Son: Have you ever heard of Barrie Trower?
Mother: No.
Son: Do you have any thoughts on 9/11?
Mother: Not very many. I know there is a theory that it (the official version of events) is not what is stated; things that are not publicly known about.
Son: On BBC R4, John Humphrys talked about Alex Jones and his pending court case regarding Sandy Hook. Do you know who Alex Jones is?
Mother: Alex Jones is the girl on the sofa on the One Show.
Son explains Alex Jones, Sandy Hook etc… : Have you heard of Sandy Hook?
Mother: No.
Son: Do you contemplate or have a comment on the so called chemtrail patterns in the sky?
Mother: I’m not very happy with them putting stuff in the sky
Son: You are assuming someone is putting stuff in the sky? Do you look up into the sky and think that looks a bit odd?
Mother: Yes. Particularly things in very straight lines.
Son: Do you have a concern about anthropological climate change?
Mother: I have a concern about things being put into the atmosphere, rather than climate change. Climate change is due to the movement of planets.
Son: So, do you think Sir David Attenborough and his colleagues can change the climate?
Mother: No.
Son: Do you worry about your carbon footprint?
Mother: No.
Son: Does 5G mean anything to you?
Mother: I’ve heard about it, but not a lot; bunches of people deciding what others think; control is what it’s about.
Son explains 5G, Agenda 21….
Son: I was born in 1963. Who killed JFK?
Mother: A chap called Oswald was accused. Who actually killed him could be a different matter.
Son: Are you aware there was a US congressional hearing to investigate and conclude it was likely a conspiracy involving more than one person?
Mother: Somewhere at the back of my mind I am.
Son: Any comment that you want to sign off with?
Mother: No… your question on Corbyn; he has the majority of people’s interest in mind and more of a peace maker than war monger. Not a killer.

Related foot notes:
Insight: An Interview with Barrie Trower on the Health Effects Of Wireless Technology:
https://www.ukcolumn.org/insight-interview-barrie-trower-health-effects-wireless-technology
Sandy Hook families v Alex Jones: Defamation case explained:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45358890
InfoWars:
https://www.infowars.com/
Geoengineering, Weather Modification, and WeaponizingNature:
https://climateviewer.com/2016/12/09/geoengineering-weather-modification-and-weaponizing-nature/
HUMANITY vs INSANITY #103 – 5G : A Threat to ALL LIFE?

Agenda 21 For Dummies:

How your community is implementing AGENDA 21:

Written summary of Agenda 21:
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
Michael Collins Piper on JFK:

JFK Assassination Records:
https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/select-committee-report
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations

A Mother Son Conversation

Copyright: Ideas Are Shared. Not Owned.

Freedom Of Thought & Action
Intellectual Property Right To Become Redundant
The Battle Of Love Over Fear

 

 

The editor of Gresham’s School magazine contacted me to apologise for failing to credit me as the artist of the painting featured on the cover of the last Michaelmas 2010 issue. It led to this interview.

How does that make you feel and how does it reflect on the way images and other intellectual property are used in our culture?

 

I feel very happy my image has been used and see it as an opportunity to convey some thoughts on the subject of copyright and patent law.

In 1997 while walking though the Chinatown area of Kuala Lumpur I noted the extensive range of bootlegged merchandise on sale; from copies of films not then even in the cinema to T-shirts by Gucci, Christian Dior and Armani to Rolex replica watches. I concluded the day I see Ned Pamphilon Productions imagery on bootleg T-shirts on sale alongside other established brands, I’ll know I have a successful brand profile.

As an adolescent I saved pocket money to buy a single vinyl record. Today a child has endless songs available at the touch of a button while if you want to know how the guitar riff of a favourite song is played, simply find it being demonstrated on YouTube. Learning to play an instrument is suddenly so much easier since access to composed and recorded material is, near as damn it, instant.

As a DJ at London’s Soho Marquee Club, I was on the mailing list of just about any record company I decided upon and everyday the postman would deliver free records from which I selected tracks to play during my working nights as a DJ. One of the bands I grew up being aware of was Metallica. Their noise was never my cup of tea, yet I made it my business to follow and monitor the progress of up and coming and established artists, therefore, I knew Metallica had developed a grass roots support base and the death of their bass player during a coach crash even further galvanised a ground swell of support and dedication to the band. They are typical of a once unknown act attaining international success on the back of a grass roots foundation, largely composed of kids with limited financial resources, copying tapes and sharing the songs of their favourite group. In recent years the likes of Metallica, U2 and ex-Undertone Fergal Sharkey, now CEO of British Music Rights, have become forerunners in monitoring music sales revenue. They are today part of the corporate machinery which might be described as the antithesis of their founding grass roots support base.

Paul McCartney has made money from simple chord songs very reminiscent of Buddy Holly compositions; let alone all the artists that influenced Holly, many unknown and unrecognised and not benefiting financially as the McCartney and Holly estates after them. Listen to Neil Diamond’s Song Sung Blue and hear melodies from Mozart’s second movement, Andante, from Piano Concerto No.21 in C major. Eric Carmen’s All By Myself borrows heavily from the second movement, Adagio Sostenuto, of Rachmaninoff’s Piano Concerto No. 2 in C minor, Opus 18. Carmen believed the classical piece to be in the public domain when finding otherwise, after the record had been issued, had to come to an agreement with the Rachmaninoff estate.

Surely, if the public likes to hear it, let it be; shared, heard, enjoyed and enable further inspiration.

The issue of idea ownership and intellectual property right, affects our everyday life. For example, how many innovations within the health and energy industries are suppressed because of copyright and patent restrictions? I bet we might be shocked and even outraged if we knew the truth.

In 1903 banker J.P. Morgan was financing the Wardenclyffe Tower project, the brainchild of U.S. citizen and Serbian immigrant, scientist Nikola Tesla who was exploring new forms of energy generation. Apparently, Morgan’s reaction to Tesla’s results was, “Great technology, but where do I put the meter?”
Finance was withdrawn because Morgan foresaw Tesla’s ‘free’ energy concept as a threat to vested interests; presumably it was a source that could not be practically owned or financially controlled. Upon Tesla’s death in 1943, his collection of papers was impounded by the United States’ Alien Property Custodian office. The same year the US Supreme Court upheld Tesla’s patent number 645576 in a ruling that served as the basis for patented radio technology in the United States. Many of the papers were released in 1952 to the Tesla Museum in Belgrade while some remain behind closed doors. It has long been the case that inventors wishing to eat regularly must sooner or later become acquainted with the ordeals of the patent process; therefore, finance and ownership have long been priorities over the sharing of ideas and innovations. It is alleged, as with so many inventions, that much of Tesla’s technological concepts have been secretly removed from mainstream circulation for fear they might threaten the profit margins of established technologies. After all, if Tesla had created a source of free energy, where would that have left the fossil fuel industries? Take note, an alternative energy is likely here, in the hands of someone somewhere, and more liberating and efficient than wind, solar, geothermal or bio-fuel sources. In part, profit concerns and patent law are keeping alternative energy technology out of public reach.

I suppose when fire and the wheel were first created by humans, the secret to their creation was initially guarded by the owners of the knowledge who were in effect implementing a form of copyright and patent control. It would be lovely to think the world in 2011 is more civilised in the sharing of innovations beneficial to the general community. Unfortunately, it appears money, profit and power continue to be the priority.

The music industry, the news information industry, health and energy industry patents, copyright and intellectual property right must at some point face a revolution in concept and approach. Keeping ideas under wraps benefits only power and profit while neglecting the natural intelligent progress of civil society.

So how will artists, authors and composers generate income? I do not have an immediate solution, but recognise a paradigm shift appears inevitable. Income can be generated by selling the fruits of one’s labour; the original physical creation and commodity such as an original artwork. Money can also be charged for admission to live performance such as a theatre show or live musical performance. The practicalities are for society’s organisers to work out, but the theory is common sense: we must share ideas to best optimise general benefit in a civil an intelligent society. Intellectual property right is an artificial concept to be dumped and left behind in the wilderness of self interest.
I was approached by several parties to provide imagery for companies in Istanbul, but if an agreement could not be reached over cost and payment, the project did not happen. In recent months I have supplied imagery to Istanbul’s Beyoğlu Municipality for free and wished I had conducted such a policy from the start. If it costs me time and expertise in compiling, organising and managing the reproduction process, I charge for my time and ‘labour’, otherwise, if a 3rd party uses a Ned Pamphilon Production image, so be it. If my consultation and direct collaboration is sought, then a business arrangement can be agreed.

In 2010 I painted portraits of Gresham’s 6 spies, which brings me to consider MI5, MI6 and the secret service networks that operate throughout the world in a never ending suppression of ideas and information in the name of national security. I propose the suppression of information, knowledge and advancements in technology and even consciousness, merely adds to the promotion of fear and the identification of an enemy to justify a trade in war and weapons fuelling the promotion of fear over love and death over life.

The internet has been a recent catalyst for an information revolution whether through the sharing of music or Julian Assange’s Wikileaks. No matter how the authorities try to manage and control the internet, IT specialists, in theory, have the possibility of always formulating a by-pass to any control restriction. This is exciting to me. For others it will be a threat, hence as I write the US are seeking legal access to private details regarding Wikileaks’ supporters and members; the kind of state interference exerted by the 3rd Reich. Watch for the emerging description: Journalism 2.0. This term relates to the internet neutrality which sits at the forefront of freedom of speech and unveiling of government corruption and ineptitude. Cyberwar has already begun: the battle to control ideas.

I deem the crux of the copyright, patent law and intellectual property rights issue is fundamentally the battle of love over fear. I propose that the day must come when profit and fear no longer prohibit the sharing of ideas and creation. We must decide which we want – to live in a state of low vibrational fear or choose high vibrational love. At this point many readers may well roll their eyes and laugh at me. Laugh away for you will produce endorphins which will be to your well being and I cannot begrudge you that.

All those companies sitting on health, medical, energy innovations better make hay with their royalty payments while they still can. My feeling is the free supply of my imagery will be a healthy path to take in the long term. Original physical creations and labour can be bought and sold while ideas cannot be ultimately owned.

Gresham’s has a history of publications and pupils with controversial and radical viewpoints so my little tuppence hapenny worth is probably neither here nor there. On the other hand, such ideas may threaten to turn the established status quo upside down and since even ‘radical’ Gresham’s is part of the establishment, it would at least demonstrate a commitment to freedom of speech should this article appear in the Gresham’s Magazine.

Ned Pamphilon

 

Gresham’s Six

Bernard Floud

 

Cedric Belfrage

 

David Doyle

 

Donald Maclean

 

James Klugman

 

Peter Floud

Please Donate To Bitcoin Address: [[address]]

Donation of [[value]] BTC Received. Thank You.
[[error]]