Bloke In A Field
…. offers better current affairs insight than the £3.74 billion BBC.
Mosques In Christchurch. What an oxymoron that is.
223a? Address of 2nd mosque
Is Jacinda Ardern carrying extra baggage?
Remove all video related to New Zealand attack
Shut down dissemination of discourse
The intellectually challenged comments again:
You Tube IF THERE WAS NO REFUGEES ORVIMMIGRANTS THAN BRITS WOULD ONLY KNOW HOW TO COOK EGG AND CHIPS.
This comment shows the level of a Remainer.
Bloody brilliant Brexit!
David Noakes unlikely to be released today
Jim Ratcliffe takes over Team ‘Sky’ so that Team Ineos will sponsor Tour de Yorkshire
Thank you Jim for providing a further opportunity to express unhappiness at Ineos fracking.
Some one in the chat comments:
You Tube BREXIT IS RACIST
…. clearly an intellectually challenged commentator
Another racist Remainer?
Renowned Israeli historian, Ilan Pappe’s groundbreaking book revisits the formation of the State of Israel. Between 1947 and 1949, over 400 Palestinian villages were deliberately destroyed, civilians were massacred and around a million men, women, and children were expelled from their homes at gunpoint.
Denied for almost six decades, had it happened today it could only have been called “ethnic cleansing”. Decisively debunking the myth that the Palestinian population left of their own accord in the course of this war, Ilan Pappe offers impressive archival evidence to demonstrate that, from its very inception, a central plank in Israel’s founding ideology was the forcible removal of the indigenous population. Indispensable for anyone interested in the current crisis in the Middle East.
Former German secretary of state Andreas von Bülow, on the 9/11 attacks
France Act 18
Macron media black-out.
The protests are not getting smaller nor going away
Geopolitics Is a Very DIRTY BUSINESS … as the Prime Minister of NZ is now realising!
JL: Brexit deal is Remain by any other name… people voted to Leave. Just Leave!
BBC: … how can you say that’s what they voted for? They didn’t know the specifics of how to Leave did they?
JL: … huge amount of anger up and down the country about the way this has been handled. There were 2 questions on the ballot paper. Do you want to Leave? Do you want to Remain? Nobody mentioned a deal. Cameron came back with his ‘only deal to be had, there would be no more deals, the decision of the referendum would be final…’
Parliament voted for Article 50 to be triggered; for the repeal of the €uropean Communities Act and fought on manifestos stating we would leave the €U, the customs union and the single market…. 80% of people voted for the 2 main parties saying that…. now they are reneging on it and betraying the country.
BBC: But, there was no specific deal to explain the terms… and now we see it is a far more complicated situation than what the referendum asked…
JL: That’s complete rubbish. Everyone knew what they were voting for; the ballot paper said Leave.
BBC: It said Leave, but did not explain the circumstances…
JL: The circumstances are very simple: we just Leave!
BBC: How on earth can you say it’s that simple? So, what happens the next day? In this simple world….
JL: In this simple world we revert to WTO, World Trade Organisation rules that most of our trade is conducted under and which most of the world’s trade is conducted under….
BBC: So, what would the tariffs be on food?
JL: The Chancellor has already stated that 87% of the tariffs would be zero, including food, clothing and footwear and flat-screen TV’s and and and…. the tariffs on those products are between 20-40%. That’s the tax the €U forces us to pay on those imported goods. The €U takes that money, not the UK government. So, the cost of living in the UK would reduce substantially, more spending power, more tax receipts, spend more on public services. That’s a simple fact.
BBC: … and the deal Theresa May is trying… you think she’s complicating it for the sake of it?
JL: Theresa May is a Remainer. She has the deal she wanted. She hasn’t had the wool pulled over her eyes. She and Chancellor Hammond want to keep the UK in the customs union. She wants a close and special relationship to keep us close to the €U as possible…. so, we can slip back in at any future stage. The whole is a betrayal. She knew exactşly what she was doing and is still doing it now.
BBC: Tariffs would be maintained under this No Deal situation… for the likes of agriculture.
JL: The Chancellor said the tariffs would be maintained on certain products: automobiles, beef, lamb etc… to protect British farmers those tariffs would be about 20%. The tariffs on those imported goods from around the world are 20% now. My view is thse tariffs should be removed over a period of time. If we remove all the tariffs on imported goods now, the boost to the economy would be so enormous it would damage the economy. The total value of tariffs is 4% GDP; like adding 1/3 to our growth rate every year for 15 years.
BBC: Some imported cars would attract tariffs, wouldn’t they?
JL: If the Chancellor were to do what he says he will do… a 10% tariff would be applied to finished automobiles coming from anywhere in the world including the €U. It would make British manufactured cars more competitive. Ford is based in Cologne, Germany, the head of Jaguar Land Rover is German, Mercedez Benz, BMW are German… they would make disparaging comment. The UK manufacturing would benefit… the Chancellor did not say he would be tariffs on manufacturing components so the UK can import cheaper components from Korea, Japan, the USA…
BBC: National Farmer’s Union President Minette Batters says eggs, cereal, fruit and vegetables wouldn’t be protected by zero tariffs.
JL: Why should consumers pay huge amounts of money to protect land owners on continental €urope?
BBC: You seriously think we should just Leave in a couple of weeks time?
BBC: Despite the CBI, some of the framing unions… the CBI say it would be like taking a sledgehammer to the economy.
JL: They would say that wouldn’t they?! I was Chairman of the CBI trades panel for 5 years, I was their economic spokesperson, I know how they work. They represent big multi-nationals whose invested interest is to maintain protectionism and charge higher prices. The British consumers are being damaged by that and it would boost the economy as a whole and jobs if we were able to remove those tariffs.
The next caller, a Remainer, at about 1 hour 20 mins referred to the last caller, John Longworth, as childish, polarised….
I listened to this Remainer, who states how he is grown-up, repeat the same old fear rhetoric of the last 2 years.
About 1 hour 30 mins David a lawyer from Poole, comes to air and informs Stephen that there will not be so called disaster or catastrophe 30 March since both sides have contingency plans.
‘Customs and the exports of goods
If the Withdrawal Agreement is not ratified, all relevant EU legislation on imported goods and exported goods will apply as of the withdrawal date. This includes the levying of duties and taxes and the respect of the formalities and controls required by the current legal framework, in order to ensure a level playing field.’
…. Stephen Nolan insists there will be change. David tries again, reading directly from the plan: no change! David explains that neither the UK or €U can afford damage to trade.
BBC: But, it’s not true!
David: Can I send you the link? I^m reading to yuo from the €U’s law and I can read the same from the UK’s law… you’re having so much difficulty in understanding what I’m saying because there’s been so much repeat of catastrophe catastrophe catastrophe disaster. Hilary Benn said he’d had a conversation with a professor on the tube and it will be catastrophe. It’s all anecdotal. Whatever else you have heard, I’m a lawyer reading the written rules.
Again, a caller educated Stephen Nolan.
The Brexit genie is out of the €U bottle and it ain’t going back in.
Mr Longworth chose to resign from his BCC post during the EU referendum campaign in order to speak freely in favour of Brexit, despite pressure from Downing Street.
The Leave Means Leave report, ‘Going Global Without Delay’, launched today rejects the so-called Norway and Swiss options for a trade deal with the EU because they are unsatisfactory and such arrangements would not allow the UK to regain control over its borders.
Instead, it urges ministers to attempt to secure a zero tariff free trade deal (similar to the deal Canada is set to sign at the end of October) with the EU once they have set in train the formal process of leaving by triggering Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. They should also make it clear at the outset that if no deal was reached with the maximum two years timeframe for negotiations, Britain should go it alone, trading with the EU under World Trade Organisation rules and seeking a Free Trade deal with other nations and blocs.
Mr Longworth joins businessman Richard Tice as Co-Chairman of Leave Means Leave. The campaign group has argued that “no deal is better than a bad deal” as Britain exits the EU and prominent supporters include former ministers Owen Paterson MP, Dominic Raab MP, Sir Gerald Howarth MP, Peter Lilley MP and David Campbell Bannerman MEP.
The report sets out criteria the UK Government should use when securing a deal with the EU which includes negotiating “as near tariff-free free trade as possible”, to ensure that it is for the “UK Parliament to solely decide its laws and trade, migration, agriculture and fisheries policies” and for Article 50 to be triggered “no later than Q1 2017”.
The report considers four principle trade options available to the Government– the Norway Option, the Swiss Option, the Canadian Option and the Global Free Trade Option.
The report found merit in the Canadian Option, “notably that Canada secured an agreement to eliminate 98 per cent of tariffs despite being only the EU’s 12th largest trading partner and with the EU running a small surplus with Canada”. This is very promising for the UK – “the EU’s largest trading partner selling well over £150 bn to the EU, a magnitude around eight times greater than Canada’s trade.”
The benefits of the Canadian Option include saving the £14.8 bn net per annum from the UKs EU membership fee, regaining full control over the UK’s borders and exempting the UK from the European Court of Justice
The major concern with the Canadian Option is the seven years it took to negotiate with the EU who are “notoriously slow”.
To overcome this issue, the report says that “the UK Government should also be very clear with the EU at the outset of negotiations that if a zero tariff deal cannot be struck within 24 months the UK will leave the EU and trade under WTO rules and we will not be bullied, or bounced into arrangements that do not meet the criteria test set out.”
At the same time, the report makes the case for the UK to “become a beacon of global free trade, encouraging cross border trade and investment, challenging other nation states, and the EU itself, to follow its example.”
A Global Free Trade Option would see the UK offer to remove all tariffs on imports from other nations providing they reciprocate.
The benefits of adopting the Global Free Trade Option include the UK regaining its seat and vote on the World Trade Organisation, restoring sovereign control to the UK Parliament and securing control of Britain’s borders.
The report concludes “because the UK is already free to trade under existing international law using WTO rules, the EU leadership could not deny diplomatically or practically that the UK can take up this option. Economically and politically, unless the EU offers tariff-free access to the UK within 24 months of triggering Article 50 the Global Free Trade Option offering the most beneficial advantages and the fewest disadvantages this becomes the optimal option.”
John Longworth, Co-Chair of Leave Means Leave, said:
“I am delighted to join the Leave Means Leave campaign.
“The British people have voted for Brexit and the Government must deliver on this in full.
“I look forward to working with senior business figures and politicians backing the case for Britain making a clean break with the EU and securing trade deals with the rest of the world.
“We should leave no later than two years after Article 50, or earlier if EU negotiations stall.”
Commenting on the appointment of John Longworth as Co-Chair, Richard Tice, Co-Chair of Leave Means Leave, said:
“I look forward to working with John on this really important campaign.
“John played a crucial role in the Brexit campaign and I look forward to the extremely valuable input he brings to Leave Means Leave.
“He will be a vital asset in securing a successful Brexit deal the British people voted for.”
Bloke In A Field
…. offers better current affairs insight than the £3.74 billion BBC.
Talk 3 weeks before Brexit…. EU Referendum … The Plan to DESTROY the UK
The ‘DEEP STATE’ Thanks US for OUR APATHY!
13.03.2019 Bloke In A Field
The Sick vs Well Biz Model
70 people turn up to support Lyn Thyer
The spirit of support was not lost on the judge
Lyn was issued with a French arrest warrant at Canterbury Police Station
So far no substance to charges against Lyn
Judiciary Whoring For Corporatocracy
GcMAF not on trial.
Multiple exciting times
Goldman Sachs: curing people is not a sustainable business model. Keeping people sick is.
Imagine: We all read each other’s thoughts; you can read everyone’s thoughts, and they yours. This was a thought I pondered, just for fun, as a young boy.
Does someone somewhere already have that technological ability; to access human thought?
In the beginning was the word? Would we need bother with words if we merely read one another’s thoughts? Would it eliminate or fortify thought crime? Author E. Michael Jones says in the beginning was logos, according to the original Greek translation. There’s a difference between word and logos.
Back to the everyday… and the latest is Baroness Varsi decrying Islamophobia… oh God, what next? Energy goes where attention flows and it seems some endlessly focus attention on race, creed and colour.
It seems every day Margaret Hedgehog or Rabbi Sucks Sacks or Barry the Gardiner or someone is condemning wide spread anti-semolinaism running rife throughout our country, though I never see, hear or experience it. Yes, I refer to semolina. Should I be more specific? Can you tell what exactly a semite is? Should it be Semite with a capital S? What exactly is a goy? Should that be with a capital G?
I am still perplexed how Margaret Hedgehog can call Jeremy Corbyn “… that fucking racist and anti-Semite…” and not be held to account. Indeed, she was invited to the BBC R4 Today programme next morning to share her grievances, her victim-hood and explain why the vile prejudice she perceives everyday culminated in her desperate need to express herself with expletives. Corbyn was said to have uttered ‘stupid woman’ under his breath and was demonised for it. It’s a good job he didn’t utter something like ‘fucking racist and anti-socialist’ under his breath. Is it some are more equal than others?
Anna Sourbuttry can refer to Trump and Brexiteers as racist, neo-Nazi, white supremacist, narcissistic, xenophobic, sexist, misogynist…. yet, woe betide anyone call her the same name. I thought it hilarious that she was called a Nazi. Anna the Nazi? Poetic justice? It seems her accuser was even associated with a self-proclaimed Zionist. I am reminded of MP John Mann accosting Ken Livingston for suggesting Nazis collaborated with Zionists. Why is an idea, a thought, so offensive? What is the accurate historical relationship between Nazis and Zionists and, God forbid, might John owe Ken an apology?
I am white. I didn’t think of myself as white until creed and colour identity was foisted upon me year after year after year. I am more flesh coloured? Pinkish? A mixture of tones? ‘White’ is a comparative description at best. I am male. I was baptised Christian. I have a penchant for sex with females rather than men; indeed, my poop-shoot works well and I have no intention of anything going up it rather than down and out of it.
I miss art critic and ardent poop-shoot engager Brian Sewell greatly. His memoirs chronicle his sexual proclivities, but I did not dislike him because of his personal peccadilloes. He was a dear friend; I did not preclude him because of my ist, ism or phobia.
I don’t care what your penchants are, so long as they are not forced upon me. Why should I care if you are ‘racist’, so long as it does not impinge upon my sovereign being? Isn’t a racist thought, just that, a mere thought? Your thoughts are your own and if you have a disposition against another because of their creed, colour or gender, that’s your choice, not mine. I think there’s a lot to be said for the old adage ‘sticks ‘n’ stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me’.
How do you change a mind of prejudice thought? Electro-shock therapy? A programme of re-education? Or just leave them be?
The recent, incessant accusing of Corbyn and anyone or anything that may fall into the huge ballpark which is anti-Semitism is so bloody tedious, I’ve had enough. If you want to accuse me anti-semolinaism, Islamophobia, racism, sexism, any ist or ism or phobia, be my guest.
Apparently, I am not one of ‘God’s chosen people’. Am I to limit my thoughts, contemplation and questions to your parameters? If I ponder what I might deem humourous, for example ‘God’s chosen lunatics’, am I committing a thought crime?
How about contemplation such as…
Does anyone know when Israel might openly declare its nuclear arsenal (Gooners! Gooners!) as it so demands of Iran?
Can Zionism be categorised as Fascism with a mythological rationalisation for terrorism and territory?
Did anyone at the BBC or within Westminster see the Al Jazeera documentary The Lobby? The scene of Joan Ryan discussing a £million bung with an Israeli agent is glorious to behold. Imagine if that agent had been Russian; I bet John Bumhumphrys and the BBC R4 Today team would have been on it in a flash.
Did Moses and Jesus criticise Jews? Does it mean they too were anti-semolinaites?
What are the realities of living in the occupied West Bank? Have any of you tried buying a direct flight into Palestine recently?
It seems the brutal treatment of young Palestinians, children, teenagers, even toddlers, is an everyday occurrence under the Israeli reign of terror. It appears Israel is far from an ethical realm and indeed, institutionally racist toward the indigenous people of the land and abusive to its poor.
Is Israel a religious ethno-state? I don’t much care what kind of state they want, so long as it does not hurt or impose upon others, but apparently it does. I wonder how many MP’s are Friends of Israel or Palestine.
For the record, as far as I understand, Israel is NOT all Jews, just as Tony Blair and his WMD lie did not represent all British people. Still, Bliar’s mate Lord Falconer is being touted to chair an inquiry into semolina and the Labour party. No Zionist connections there then! You can’t make this stuff up; such chutzpah!
My Jewish uncle says, “Don’t be a mug…” and anyone who still believes that racism or anti-Jewishism is rampant in the UK or that the Westminster MP’s sincerely represent the will of the people… is a mug!
On top of race, creed and colour distinction, we are now being quizzed daily over gender identity. I’m a boy! I’m a boy! I’m sure of it, a goy boy!
So, I am initiating my own campaign and dialectic. I have had enough of the exploitation of the Goy with a capital G to fight wars for others. I have had enough of being demonised and accused daily on the BBC and within Westminster. I have had enough of The Lobby influencing our elected MP’s. I have never been a slave owner, never invaded another foreign nation state, do not employ or engage others based upon creed, colour or gender and I stand proud in declaring my organ has been used in vagina, not bottom engagement.
I’ve had enough and from this moment forth, if you accuse me, I’ll retort that you are being Goyist or displaying Goyism and, therefore, must surely be Goyphobic and anti-Goy!